|
Assembly
LX: Free Speech, Free Expression and Free Inquiry at Yale
Friday, April 26 through Saturday,
April 27, 2002
First Assembly Session
Of Values and Priorities: History
and Practice of Free Speech at Yale
Note: a full
audio recording of the opening session is available at www.aya.yale.edu/assembly/s02/gbpres.htm.
Please refer to these recordings for full details and also direct
other alumni to this site to listen to the recordings.
Early Friday afternoon following the luncheon,
Maureen O. Doran '71 MSN welcomed delegates to the 60th AYA
Assembly and introduced Assembly chair Mark Greenwold '66.
In his opening remarks, Greenwold referenced the report of the Woodward
committee, which was formulated in 1972 and remains the defining
document for the university's policies regarding freedom of speech:
"The primary function of a university is to
discover and disseminate knowledge by means of research and teaching.
To fulfill this function a free interchange of ideas is necessary
not only within its walls but with the world beyond as well. It
follows that the university must do everything possible to ensure
within it the fullest degree of intellectual freedom. The history
of intellectual growth and discovery clearly demonstrates the need
for unfettered freedom, the right to think the unthinkable, discuss
the unmentionable, and challenge the unchallengeable. To curtail
free expression, strikes twice at intellectual freedom, for whoever
deprives another of the right to state unpopular views necessarily
also deprives others of the right to listen to those views."
(See the full text of the report at http://www.aya.yale.edu/assembly/s02/woodward.pdf.)
Greenwold then posed the following questions:
- Does the Woodward Report correctly define the
function of the University?
- How does scholarly expression differ from political
expression of free speech?
- What are the constraints on inquiry as it relates
to research and teaching?
- What are the overt versus unstated limitations
on free speech?
He also discussed at some length the tensions
that arise between free speech and other values that may conflict
with free speech.
|